I'm writing this while watching Inside Edition, a show I don't normally watch, so excuse the unstructured appearence of it.
Only moments ago a segment on Katherine Harris, Florida's Secretary of State, aired. The purpose of the piece was not to discuss Harris's work during the recent presidential election, or her work as Secretary, in fact it did not discuss anything of substance. No, the entire segment was about her "look." Yes, her "look." Like most women in positions of power, the most important thing is their appearance and Harris is no exception. In our society, a woman's work is insignificant compared to the way she looks and regardless of the work Harris has done, the focus was on her appearance and what she will wear to the Inaugural Ball. Why is that important? Well, because people think she's unattractive and she has to save face by showing up in a stunning couture gown. If she doesn't, she will never escape the insults and grade school attitudes of the media and other power players.
Yes, this upsets me. How often do you see a news story on a male politician because he mixed stripes with plaid or wore two different shades of blue that obviously clashed? I'd venture to say almost never. Why is that? Simply put: A man's work is what is important. A man can look like a horse's behind and no one will care or if they do, they won't comment on it. And even if they did, the man certainly wouldn't have to rush out and get a makeover or even go as far as getting plastic surgery, which Linda Tripp of Clinton/Lewinsky scandal fame did because everyone was so disgusted with the way she looked.
So, what's the moral of the story? If you're an unattractive or unstylish woman, stay out of the public spotlight.
Pretty shallow and completely asinine.