|
september 17, 2001
//00:54 i have so much to say. my mind has been buzzing with thoughts all day. but i don't want to talk; i've already done too much of that. i'm tired. my hope was drained today. i want to think - for just a moment - of something else. i would find some nice music, gaze at the stars, lose myself in a book... but i'm not in the mood. so it's off to sleep. sweet dreams. tomorrow is a new day. |
|
september 16, 2001
//01:23 i've read a number of opinions and articles today. this was, by far, the best one. |
|
september 15, 2001
//11:15 i'm reminded of the old bill clinton quote, "we will continue bombing until there is peace." it's this sort of logic, tendered once again by so many u.s. leaders, that terrifies the hell out of me. |
|
september 14, 2001
//23:45 a number of links at kottke.org that are, i agree, "worth reading for one reason or another." like jason, i "don't necessarily endorse any of the viewpoints, but ... they are definitely part of our collective education about the situation we find ourselves in." i've noticed a number of columnists writing statements to the effect of "americans deserved it; it's entirely their fault." i tend to think it's foolish to even get into that game. i take the approach i read today in a thoughtful mailing list message (there was more; e-mail if you want the full post): "true realism, on the other hand, doesn't mean blaming americans for bringing these horrifying and truly evil acts on themselves. it does mean trying to imagine foreign perspectives from which government conduct might appear so intolerable that some people might be driven to take atrocious revenge. the great director jean renoir was once asked why there were no villains in his films. he answered simply, 'everyone has his reasons.' your most bitter enemy may have his reasons for hating your guts. you may not think they are good or sufficient reasons, but you'd better take them into account. if he has any brains, he may find a way to hurt you."
to celebrate the death of another human being is truly beyond my comprehension, and illustrates the fact that we still haven't figured out that we're all the same. truly sad. it's worth pointing out, however, that there are always different ways of seeing things. if you can get a glimpse of those different ways, it might help you understand what those people are doing and why. as the wealthiest and most powerful nation on the planet, it is inevitable that the presence and influence of the united states will be felt in nations worldwide. we've meddled everywhere - for good and for bad. someone will always disagree with actions taken by the u.s., and resentment becomes greater because any powerful nation will automatically be seen as a bully who is impossible to fight. so even when we do things that we see as good and just, there are bound to be discontented people. that's the nature of the game. but it seems that many americans are unaware that we have made some mistakes. we've done things that most in the united states would, i think, admit were bad - if only they knew about them. consider the nature of our relationships with our neighbors in central and south america. during the eighties we trained and armed geurillas who, by many reports, are responsible for the death of thousands upon thousands of civilians. this is one example among many. indeed, we have done similar things in the middle east. osama bin laden himself was part of a group in afghanistan who were used by the united states, trained by the c.i.a. to fight in the soviet-afghanistan conflict. ironic that at one time we promoted their geurilla warfare and terrorism. like i say, it's chilling to see pictures of palestinians celebrating in the street - how can anyone celebrate the death of another? there is nothing on earth that can justify what we have witnessed this week. but before we get righteous and start plotting revenge, i think it would pay to sit back, close our eyes, and imagine - just for a second - what our perspective might be if we lived in a different part of the world. the united states should take this opportunity to show the world that we really do value our high ideals. we can rise above this disaster. and while we focus on making our country safer and more secure, and in seeking justice for those responsible, we should also evaluate our foreign policy and make serious changes if necessary. we're all human beings in this little boat together, like it or not. we need to learn how to live together. (you would think we could have figured it out by now...)
|
|
september 13, 2001
//23:43 i was reading some of the things james lileks wrote on his site, and really liked it. especially the following passage: 10:12 The World Trade Center is not America. Oh, in a way it is - a marvel of engineering, a hub of wealth creation, designed by a man of Japanese ancestry, constructed by hand by citizens whose people came from Europe, Asia, Africa. Men who prayed to one God, to many, to none. All colors and creeds constructed that building; like any skyscraper in any American city, the World Trade Center was the legend of Babel refuted in stone and glass. But it was merely a manifestation of America. If the terrorists had a finer grasp of American culture, they might have headed for the Empire State Building. It has a greater claim as a national symbol. It went up during the overture to the Depression, a statement of optimism in a world of compounded doom. Its lines are serious and austere, yet romantic and ennobling. A zeppelin docked at its summit; King Kong climbed its cliffs. Even the name contains the contradictions of America - we are an empire, yes but an empire whose provinces are knitted together by an idea. A concept. A bold proposition: citizenship is not based on blood, on clan, on tribe, but on a belief in an ideal. An ideal often soiled by the crude hands of mere humans, yes. But an ideal whose worst manifestation in our history is still a hundred times better than the world the terrorists wish to bring about.
a list of companies affected by the attack. the idea seems to be that while we have no list of individuals and families directly affected, we can honor employees and families of the companies we know were affected. even this short list (relatively speaking, that is) helps illustrate the staggering nature of the attack. and an article entitled u.s. disaster causes some to slip a gear - conspiracy and commemoration. worth reading.
to address some other people regarding different posts... |
|
september 12, 2001
//14:10 i've started to notice talk of world war iii. nostradamus. numerology. the book of revelations. armageddon. for a brief time, i found myself reading these things seriously. encountering that sense of dread. this is a far cry from my typical behavior. after a moment, i came to, and i began asking myself why i had even been reading that stuff carefully in the first place. but this isn't the world we know, and our lives will not be quite the same as we were. we're forced to learn how to look at the world in a different way. it is precisely when our emotions are running high that we need our rational side to take over and be in control. more than ever we need our rationality, as it is our most important tool as we begin to deal with this on so many levels... emotionally, mentally, and psychologically.
|
|
september 11, 2001
//23:32 never mind, i'm not sleepy. a few more links... a long, but interesting compilation from salon.com: what does it all mean? human terror, an article from slate. and now - finally - it's time for me to end this day.
here are some stories that might be of interest to you (most of these are linked to on talkwire): in case, like me, you're wondering how the terrorists were able to get control of the aircraft, other stories of interest are ...more later. i need to go outside and take a walk.
i can't believe the news today -- u2, sunday bloody sunday (war, 1983) ----- softly, he glides along the streets and alleys the wind in my heart mojique buys equipment in the marketplace mojique smells the wind that comes from far away the wind in my heart -- talking heads (david byrne), listening wind (remain in light, 1980) ----- heaven on earth where i grew up it's already gone too far -- u2 (bono), peace on earth (all that you can't leave behind, 2000)
so pick a project and help your computer's processor live up to its potential. (for those of you concerned about energy considerations, visit seti@home's 'running green' page for info. and links.)
|
|
september 10, 2001
//02:09 i'm still itching to share song lyrics with you, but in a rare show of restraint, i won't. on to today's link. hmmm.... (sorting through list)..... hmm...... let's try this one: john's idiot of the day |
|
september 8, 2001
//01:08 ah... today i link to one of my all time favorite sites: astronomy picture of the day this site has been around for ages, displaying amazing photographs day after day. each photo is accompanied by an interesting write-up explaining it. (i might note that this is one of the few sites i frequent which has always tried to follow the original idea of hypertext and generously sprinkles their text with links - there are some others, maybe i'll link to them sometime.) they have an enormous archive of these incredible pictures, dating back to 1995 (yep, they've been doing it since then). good stuff; i hope you enjoy it. //00:40 i often yearn for the early days of the web. right now is one of those times. back in the early days, when you used someone's design, you sent - at the very least - a quick note introducing yourself and saying that you liked it and might even use something similar on your site. you usually received a reply along the lines of 'thanks, glad you like the site. good luck with yours.' those were the unspoken rules of conduct. it was all very pleasant and congenial. hell, you might even become friends with the person. this sort of thing happens much more rarely these days. but, then, courtesy in general seems more rare with each passing day (in both the real and virtual worlds). i think it's absolutely great when someone actually likes my design enough to use something similar. we've all been inspired by designs and used their ideas on our own sites. but i have to admit being slightly annoyed when people take my design and fail to even send me a brief note. i have no idea how many times this has happened. i've only discovered it two or three times over the years, when people rip the html source and forget to take something out. as, for example, ase did when they forgot to remove my frames comments from their source. the site isn't too remarkably similar to mine, but when you rip someone's code, can't you at least inform them? by pure chance i have caught two other companies - one of them a web design / content company who claimed they came up with the design. their sites were much closer to mine than the one i just mentioned, but they've since changed the design, so no links - i'm nice, really... but i have to wonder how many times this has happened. it's not that i think my design is in any way remarkable or that i don't want people to use it - on the contrary, i'm thrilled when people do so. (even businesses.) it just boils down to the idea that when you see something you like (i'm not just talking web designs here), you should at least have the courtesy to send a quick 'hey, good idea. i like it. i think i'll take that idea and change it to fit my own style / needs. thanks for coming up with it.' or maybe i'm just in a bad mood. a topic for later: i had a discussion which turned to real-life shortly after. it was about (among other things), people who think the world owes them something. and i'll tack on the annoyance of being scolded when you try to do someone a favor. |
|
september 7, 2001
//00:36 the idea behind bottle mail is very interesting. please note that i have not downloaded the software or tried the service, so i have no idea what it's actually like. i just thought the idea was cool. (you can also read a wired news article about it.) |
|
september 6, 2001
//02:01 in the spirit of all those clever things you wrote on napkins at restaurants comes napkin.org. there's a huge collection of user-submitted thoughts, ranging from silly to clever, stupid to profound. it's a fantastic place to waste some time or alleviate boredom. if nothing else, a few of the thoughts will undoubtedly bring a smile to your face. |
|
september 5, 2001
//16:47 when it comes to computers, i'm a firm believer that quieter is better. i really dislike noisy fans and whiny hard drives. my current power mac desktop has a couple of fans, but as far as desktops go, it's relatively quiet. maybe the fans are just higher quality or something, i don't know... (it seems odd that i've had to replace the fans in every single p.c. - brand-name and non-brand-name alike - i've ever owned (save the old 286), yet i've never had a single fan go bad in any of my macs). luckily, the g4 is a relatively cool processor, so the power mac doesn't need one of those small processor fans which always seem to be the loudest and whiniest of all. when i got my powerbook g4, i loved how quiet it was. there was a slight whine from the hard drive and the cd/dvd drive got noisy sometimes, but it was quieter than any other computer i had owned. after a few weeks of bliss, the ibm travelstar hard drive in the powerbook started to get louder and louder. it got to the point that the nearly silent powerbook was suddenly starting to sound louder than the desktop machine - all due to a noisy hard drive. unfortunately, it's normal for drives to become slightly noisier over time, so i figured i would have to cause a big fuss to get it replaced. since i wanted more space than it offered anyway, i decided it was time to look for a new drive. i soon discovered the new line of ibm travelstar drives. one of the advances is that instead of ball bearings, they use fluid bearings - one result is a decrease in noise. i couldn't exactly afford the 48GB model, so I settled on the 30GB travelstar 30GN. i picked up a firewire (aka IEEE 1394) enclosure for the old drive. it's a great way to turn an internal drive into a fast external drive. (just stick the drive in the enclosure and connect it to the computer with a firewire cable. the new drive pops up on the desktop, ready to use.) when you hold one of these tiny drives in your hand, it's amazing to consider how much information can be held in such a small, relatively inexpensive device. (note: i am writing these words so i can laugh at them 10 years from now...) i started up the computer and wondered where the noise was. then i heard a muffled read/write sound from the drive and i knew that it was working after all. this drive is quiet. it's quieter than other drives while accessing the disk, but when it's idle, you can't even tell it's running (even through the thin case of the powerbook g4). i quickly moved the contents of the old drive (now external) to the new one, rebooted, and here i am to tell you that i am once again experiencing the bliss of quiet computing. this drive is amazingly quiet. ahhh, the sound of silence. hopefully it will last this time. (if things get too quiet around here i can just turn on the old drive and fill my head with that wonderful whining buzzy sound.) if you made it through all of that, congratulations. |
|
september 4, 2001
//00:20 somehow an article from 1998 still finds itself in my bookmarks list. i like to think that it somehow survived multiple bookmark spring-cleanings and computer calamities. more likely, i simply discovered it long after publication. in any case, it's a great article worth a few minutes of your time: the three immensities |
|
september 3, 2001
//23:26 my my my. hmmm..... hp buys compaq. (you can read the new york times article but you will need to be registered [free].) //01:36 some of you may remember when yahoo! had a link on their front page which would take you to a random web site. the link has long since disappeared from their front page, but you can still use it. just enter http://random.yahoo.com/bin/ryl into your browser and away you go. you will soon discover that the web is comprised mostly of shit (like so many things in this world). but it can be fun and interesting nontheless (i never said shit wasn't fun and interesting - why do you think i made this site?) waayyyy back in 1996 they even had a statistics page that utilized the random link. it has been defunct since then. but if you actually care enough to look around, there are a number of similar 'random' statistics pages. and for more random link fun, go here. |